<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show Off Your Mac Setup In The MacBattle Arena</title>
	<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/</link>
	<description>365 Days Of My Experience With Apple As A Switcher</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad/Xero</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-602</link>
		<author>Nomad/Xero</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-602</guid>
					<description>20,930,000,000

I got varying results with the same keywords depending on what time i did the search... that seems a little odd to me. The first time i searched i only got 10 billion results, but the blog was down, two hours later i got 20 billion with same search. you might want to try yours again.

The really ironic thing is that the first site on the results page for this search is: www.apple.com/getamac/ (it really is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20,930,000,000</p>
<p>I got varying results with the same keywords depending on what time i did the search&#8230; that seems a little odd to me. The first time i searched i only got 10 billion results, but the blog was down, two hours later i got 20 billion with same search. you might want to try yours again.</p>
<p>The really ironic thing is that the first site on the results page for this search is: <a href="http://www.apple.com/getamac/" rel="nofollow">www.apple.com/getamac/</a> (it really is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad/Xero</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-603</link>
		<author>Nomad/Xero</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-603</guid>
					<description>also note that while google may know of 2E10 results, the will only tell you where the first 1000 are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also note that while google may know of 2E10 results, the will only tell you where the first 1000 are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Young</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-604</link>
		<author>Nick Young</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-604</guid>
					<description>Wow, your right.  The search that gave me 8.5 billion before now gives me 17 billion.  It was just the letter a.  Thats kinda odd.  I found it strange that the letter a gives more results than the letter e.  You would think that the letter e would give more results since the letter e's frequency in the English language is 12.7% compared to a's 8.2%... according to &lt;a href="http://www.simonsingh.net/The_Black_Chamber/frequencyanalysis.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this site&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, your right.  The search that gave me 8.5 billion before now gives me 17 billion.  It was just the letter a.  Thats kinda odd.  I found it strange that the letter a gives more results than the letter e.  You would think that the letter e would give more results since the letter e&#8217;s frequency in the English language is 12.7% compared to a&#8217;s 8.2%&#8230; according to <a href="http://www.simonsingh.net/The_Black_Chamber/frequencyanalysis.html" rel="nofollow">this site</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad/Xero</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-605</link>
		<author>Nomad/Xero</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-605</guid>
					<description>*A*

I dont know what the * * does exactly, but I thought i would try it because in some other software it returns all results that contain whatever is between them, oddly enough *E* still produces less results that *A* so it can't be treating the * * the way i thought it might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*A*</p>
<p>I dont know what the * * does exactly, but I thought i would try it because in some other software it returns all results that contain whatever is between them, oddly enough *E* still produces less results that *A* so it can&#8217;t be treating the * * the way i thought it might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Young</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-606</link>
		<author>Nick Young</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-606</guid>
					<description>LOL, thats the same search I did right before posting that comment.  Your right.  You were correct in how you understood the * character.  The * is known as the wild card character.  It takes the place of any number of characters.  So if you do a search for *ot you should get {hot, bot, boot, root, ...}.  By placing the * before and after the word it means that any number of characters (even 0) can be before and after the letter.  Its especially nice when searching for a word that could end with s, ed, ing.  Because it will include all of those words in the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, thats the same search I did right before posting that comment.  Your right.  You were correct in how you understood the * character.  The * is known as the wild card character.  It takes the place of any number of characters.  So if you do a search for *ot you should get {hot, bot, boot, root, &#8230;}.  By placing the * before and after the word it means that any number of characters (even 0) can be before and after the letter.  Its especially nice when searching for a word that could end with s, ed, ing.  Because it will include all of those words in the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad/Xero</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-607</link>
		<author>Nomad/Xero</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-607</guid>
					<description>but if google was treating it that way it should return more results for *E* than *A* right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but if google was treating it that way it should return more results for *E* than *A* right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Young</title>
		<link>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-615</link>
		<author>Nick Young</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.keynote2keynote.com/2007/03/26/show-off-your-mac-setup-in-the-macbattle-arena/#comment-615</guid>
					<description>You would think, but here's my hypothesis why things are ending up differently.

It would be interesting to see what the letter frequency is of the words of the average persons &lt;a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/howmany.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;vocabulary&lt;/a&gt;.  They say that the average person uses between 10,000 and 25,000 words depending on their level of education.  So although E may have the highest frequency in the English language, that may not be true of those 10,000 to 25,000 words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think, but here&#8217;s my hypothesis why things are ending up differently.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see what the letter frequency is of the words of the average persons <a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/howmany.htm" rel="nofollow">vocabulary</a>.  They say that the average person uses between 10,000 and 25,000 words depending on their level of education.  So although E may have the highest frequency in the English language, that may not be true of those 10,000 to 25,000 words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
